New Rights to Trademark Generic Brands
Friends,
On Monday, the Supreme Court issued an opinion that drastically changes the landscape of trademark law. Businesses use trademarks to protect a brand from being confusingly similar to other brands. Strong trademarks also encourage consumers to trust certain trademarks over others. For instance, reportedly 65% of single men buy Tide detergent because that was the detergent their mothers used.
One of the main criteria for a trademark is that it cannot be generic or merely descriptive. For example, the brand “Bob’s Cleaning” for a person named Bob who runs a cleaning business would likely have been denied by the United States Patent Trademark Office for being generic or merely descriptive.
In United States Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com, the Supreme Court decided that Booking.com, the well-known travel website, is not a generic name and thus can be trademarked. The court reasoned that adding “.com” to a generic term makes it not generic because web domains are
unique, and only one business can occupy a domain at given time.
This opinion emphasized the importance of domains, and it may further encourage domain squatters, which is an issue our clients routinely face. We can assist you if you have any questions about trademarks, how to leverage trademarks to grow your business, how to make a strong trademark, or other legal and business concerns around branding and domains.
Best,
Dan Kramer
Related Article
Psychedelic Therapy & Law Update – November 2025
Colorado Regulator Releases updated NMHA Screening Forms Colorado’s primary NMHA regulator, DORA, recently released new and updated model forms for work in the regulated area. These forms include 12 recommended forms to comply with the rules along with guidance documents and checklists for using the forms. All of the updated state forms can be found here. […]
Psychedelic Therapy & Law Update – October 2025
Clarification of Facilitator’s Right to Handle Medicine under NMHA In the Colorado regulated NMHA healing center context, the rules say that licensed Facilitators can administer natural medicine to participant, but how broad is the term administer? Can Facilitators for example move medicine from a secure area and hand it to a participant? This created some […]
Psychedelic Therapy & Law Update – September 2025
Slow start to NMHA Program, but Iboga (ibogaine) added As of mid-September, 2025, the regulated program under Natural Medicine Health Act has only 5 approved full healing centers in Colorado. Sixteen micro-healing centers have been approved to date. Healing centers are not required to report their number of journeys until the end of the year, […]